Jump to a question:
MOLDOVA - was officially the poorest country in Europe.
Moldova is a small country in Eastern Europe with a complex and often turbulent history. Nestled between Romania and Ukraine, it has long been caught in the geopolitical struggles of larger powers. In the 20th century, Moldova’s fate was shaped by imperial collapse, Soviet occupation, and ongoing disputes over the separatist region of Transnistria. Today, Moldova stands at a crossroads, balancing its aspirations for closer integration with Europe against persistent pressure from Russia.
At the dawn of the 20th century, the territory that now constitutes Moldova was largely part of the Russian Empire, known as Bessarabia. Annexed from the Ottoman vassal state of Moldavia in 1812, Bessarabia became a borderland between Russian and Romanian culture. The majority of the population were Romanian-speaking peasants, while the ruling elite often adopted Russian or other European identities.
When the Russian Empire collapsed during World War I and the 1917 Russian Revolution, Bessarabia seized the opportunity to chart its own course. In December 1917, local leaders proclaimed the Moldavian Democratic Republic, initially as an autonomous region within Russia. However, with the chaos of civil war spreading, Moldovan leaders sought protection from Romania. In 1918, Bessarabia voted to unite with the Kingdom of Romania, a union that would last until 1940.
During this interwar period, Moldova was integrated into Romanian political and cultural life, though tensions remained. Romanian authorities sought to centralize administration and promote Romanian language and identity, while some minorities, particularly Russians and Ukrainians, felt marginalized.
The outbreak of World War II drastically altered Moldova’s trajectory. In August 1939, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, a secret agreement dividing Eastern Europe into spheres of influence. Under this arrangement, the Soviet Union claimed Bessarabia.
In June 1940, the Soviet Union issued an ultimatum to Romania, demanding Bessarabia and northern Bukovina. Facing German pressure and Soviet military strength, Romania ceded the territories without a fight. The Soviets quickly annexed Bessarabia, merging most of it with a portion of Ukrainian territory to create the Moldavian Soviet Socialist Republic (Moldavian SSR).
The Soviet takeover was accompanied by mass arrests, deportations, and suppression of Romanian identity. Land was collectivized, and the Moldovan language (essentially Romanian, but written in Cyrillic script under Soviet rules) was promoted as distinct from Romanian, part of Moscow’s effort to weaken cultural ties with Romania.
In 1941, when Nazi Germany and Romania invaded the Soviet Union, Romanian forces retook Bessarabia. However, the wartime Romanian administration collaborated in Nazi atrocities, including the deportation and murder of Jews and Roma. By 1944, the Red Army reconquered the territory, restoring Soviet rule until the end of the Cold War.
Life in Soviet Moldova was marked by both repression and modernization. The Stalinist period saw waves of deportations to Siberia, arrests of intellectuals, and efforts to erase Romanian cultural influence. Thousands were accused of being “class enemies” and sent to labour camps.
At the same time, Soviet policies industrialized parts of Moldova, particularly the eastern region across the Dniester River (later known as Transnistria). Factories, power plants, and infrastructure were developed there, while central and western Moldova remained largely agricultural. This economic disparity would later contribute to separatist tensions.
Culturally, Moscow promoted a distinct “Moldovan” identity, separate from Romania. The language was written in Cyrillic, and education emphasized loyalty to the Soviet Union. Despite these pressures, many Moldovans maintained awareness of their Romanian roots, particularly through clandestine cultural and religious expression.
By the late 1980s, Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms of glasnost and perestroika unleashed suppressed national sentiments across the Soviet Union. In Moldova, activists pushed for recognition of the Romanian language, adoption of the Latin alphabet, and closer ties with Romania. Massive demonstrations in Chișinău in 1989 helped secure these reforms.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, Moldova declared independence on August 27, 1991. Independence brought new hope but also immense challenges: economic collapse, corruption, and unresolved ethnic and regional divisions.
One of the most pressing challenges for the young republic was the separatist movement in Transnistria, the strip of land east of the Dniester River. This region, heavily industrialized and with a large Russian-speaking population, resisted Moldova’s pro-Romanian cultural policies and feared unification with Romania.
In 1990, local leaders in Tiraspol declared the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic (PMR), or Transnistria, though it was not internationally recognized. Tensions escalated into open conflict in 1992, as Moldovan forces clashed with separatists supported by Russian troops from the 14th Army, stationed in the region since Soviet times.
The brief but bloody war ended with a Russian-brokered ceasefire. Since then, Transnistria has remained a de facto independent entity, with its own government, military, and currency, but recognized by no UN member states. Russia maintains a military presence there under the guise of “peacekeepers,” giving it a strategic foothold in Moldova and limiting Chișinău’s sovereignty.
Since independence, Moldova has struggled to balance its relations between Russia and the West. Economically dependent and politically fragile, the country has faced repeated crises.
Relations with Russia: Moscow has used energy supplies, trade embargoes, and its influence in Transnistria to pressure Moldova. Gas disputes have left Moldova vulnerable to Russian leverage. Russian media also wields significant influence among parts of the Moldovan population, particularly in Transnistria and Gagauzia (another autonomous region).
Relations with Romania and the EU: Moldova shares deep cultural and linguistic ties with Romania, which has often supported its pro-European aspirations. Many Moldovans have obtained Romanian citizenship, granting them access to the European Union. In recent years, Moldova has signed association agreements with the EU and pursued closer integration, though corruption and political instability have slowed progress.
Internal Divisions: Moldova’s politics have often swung between pro-European and pro-Russian governments. While much of the population favours EU integration, others—especially in Russian-speaking regions—remain wary of alienating Moscow.
The war in Ukraine since 2014, and especially Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, has dramatically heightened Moldova’s security concerns. Moldova, bordering Ukraine and located near Odesa, finds itself at risk of Russian destabilization. Moscow continues to support Transnistria and uses it as leverage against Moldova’s Western aspirations.
In recent years, Moldova under President Maia Sandu has pursued a strongly pro-European course. Sandu’s government has sought to reduce reliance on Russian energy, strengthen ties with Romania, and deepen integration with the EU. In 2022, Moldova was granted EU candidate status, marking a historic shift.
However, Russia still exerts influence. It supports pro-Russian political parties in Moldova, spreads disinformation through media, and maintains its military presence in Transnistria. While an outright invasion like that of Ukraine may be unlikely, the risk of hybrid destabilization—through energy blackmail, propaganda, or manipulation of separatist regions—remains very real.
Moldova’s history since 1900 has been shaped by the competing forces of empire, nationalism, and geopolitical rivalry. From its time as Bessarabia under the Russian Empire, through Soviet annexation and repression, to independence in 1991, Moldova has endured immense challenges. The unresolved conflict in Transnistria continues to symbolize the country’s vulnerability to Russian influence.
Yet Moldova is also a story of resilience. Despite economic hardship and political instability, it has maintained its sovereignty and moved closer to the European Union. Today, Moldova stands as a frontline state in the broader contest between Russia’s desire to maintain influence in its former empire and the aspirations of smaller nations to chart their own futures.
The choices Moldova makes, and the support it receives from its European partners, will determine whether it can finally escape the shadow of foreign domination and secure a stable, democratic, and independent future.
Moldova is a land of undulating countryside and relies to a large extent on agriculture. The fields are worked largely by hand and during the season hundreds of workers can be seen with hand tools tending the soil and the crops. School holidays are long, which enables the children to help in the fields.
Extreme poverty can be seen almost everywhere, not only in the villages but also in the towns. The centres of Chişinău and Bălți are on the face of it quite prosperous but just away from the centre extreme poverty again can be found.
Generally speaking, the people are extremely hard working and generous with the very little that they have.
It is true to say, the world was very impressed in the way the people of Moldova welcomed the thousands of refugees who fled the escalating war at the beginning of 2022
Ukraine’s modern history is defined by both tragedy and resilience. At the heart of Europe’s borderlands, Ukraine has often been caught between great powers, its independence suppressed, and its people subjected to immense suffering. From the upheavals of the early 1900s, through the Holodomor under Soviet rule, to independence in 1991 and the ongoing war with Russia, Ukraine’s story is one of survival against relentless attempts to deny its sovereignty.
At the dawn of the 20th century, Ukraine was divided between empires. Eastern and central regions were ruled by the Russian Empire, while western Ukraine lay within the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Ukrainian language and culture were often suppressed, particularly in Russian-controlled territories where efforts at Russification sought to erase distinct Ukrainian identity.
The chaos following World War I and the Russian Revolution opened a window for Ukrainian independence. In 1917, after the collapse of the Russian monarchy, the Ukrainian People’s Republic was proclaimed in Kyiv. However, Ukraine quickly became a battleground for multiple forces: Bolsheviks, nationalists, White Russian armies, and foreign occupiers. For a brief period, several Ukrainian governments claimed authority, but by 1921, most of Ukraine had been forcibly incorporated into the new Soviet Union. Western territories, meanwhile, were divided between Poland, Romania, and Czechoslovakia. The dream of a lasting independent state was crushed—at least for the time being.
The 1920s initially saw limited cultural autonomy for Ukraine under Soviet policy, known as “Ukrainization.” Ukrainian literature, education, and political life briefly flourished. But this changed dramatically when Joseph Stalin consolidated power. Determined to industrialize the USSR and exert absolute control, Stalin launched forced collectivization of agriculture in the late 1920s.
Ukraine, known as Europe’s “breadbasket,” became a primary target. Farmers, many of whom resisted giving up their land and grain, were labeled “kulaks” (wealthy peasants) and enemies of the state. The Soviet regime imposed impossibly high grain quotas, confiscated food, and punished villages that failed to comply. Armed units sealed off communities, preventing starving peasants from fleeing to cities or neighboring regions.
The result was a catastrophic famine between 1932 and 1933, known as the Holodomor (“death by hunger”). Estimates suggest that between 3 and 4 million Ukrainians died. Eyewitness accounts describe entire villages perishing, parents unable to feed their children, and bodies left unburied because survivors were too weak. Scholars widely regard the Holodomor as a man-made famine, deliberately engineered to break Ukrainian resistance and suppress national identity.
This famine was not only a humanitarian catastrophe but also a political tool. By decimating Ukraine’s rural population, Stalin undermined a social base that might have resisted Soviet control. The trauma of the Holodomor left deep scars on Ukrainian society, shaping collective memory and reinforcing mistrust of Moscow’s authority.
The Second World War brought further devastation. In 1939, under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, the Soviet Union annexed western Ukrainian lands from Poland. Two years later, Nazi Germany invaded the Soviet Union, turning Ukraine into a central battleground. Occupation was brutal: millions of Ukrainians perished, including Jews targeted in the Holocaust. Cities like Kyiv and Kharkiv were reduced to rubble, while partisan resistance movements operated in forests and rural areas.
By 1944, the Red Army retook Ukraine, but liberation quickly gave way to renewed Soviet domination. Nationalist movements in western Ukraine continued to resist, fighting guerrilla wars against Soviet forces into the early 1950s. The postwar decades saw rapid industrialization and urbanization, but also strict political repression. Ukrainian culture was censored, and the memory of the Holodomor was silenced in official Soviet narratives.
Despite repression, Ukrainian identity endured. Intellectuals, writers, and dissidents kept alive the idea of national sovereignty, often at great personal cost. The 1980s brought cracks in the Soviet system under Mikhail Gorbachev’s policies of glasnost (openness) and perestroika (restructuring). In Ukraine, these reforms encouraged discussion of long-suppressed topics like the Holodomor and environmental disasters such as the Chernobyl nuclear accident of 1986, which highlighted the Soviet government’s negligence.
As the Soviet Union weakened, Ukrainian independence movements gained momentum. On August 24, 1991, Ukraine’s parliament declared independence, and in a December referendum, more than 90% of Ukrainians voted to approve it, with strong support across all regions. For the first time in centuries, Ukraine stood as a sovereign state.
The decades following independence were turbulent. Ukraine faced immense economic challenges, widespread corruption, and internal political divisions. Still, democracy took root, with elections and peaceful transfers of power.
In 2004, the Orange Revolution erupted after a fraudulent election that initially declared Moscow-backed Viktor Yanukovych the winner. Massive protests in Kyiv’s Independence Square (the Maidan) forced a re-run of the vote, bringing pro-Western candidate Viktor Yushchenko to power. This movement reinforced Ukraine’s democratic aspirations and its desire for closer ties with Europe.
Nearly a decade later, the Euromaidan protests of 2013–2014 marked another turning point. When President Yanukovych (back in office) rejected a planned association agreement with the European Union in favor of closer ties with Russia, Ukrainians again flooded the streets demanding change. After months of protests and deadly clashes with security forces, Yanukovych fled the country in February 2014.
Russia reacted swiftly and aggressively to Ukraine’s pro-European trajectory. In March 2014, Russian troops occupied and illegally annexed Crimea, citing the need to protect ethnic Russians and strategic interests in the Black Sea. Shortly after, Moscow fueled separatist uprisings in eastern Ukraine’s Donbas region, supplying arms, financing, and even soldiers. The ensuing conflict killed more than 14,000 people between 2014 and 2021, despite international mediation attempts through the Minsk agreements.
For Ukraine, these years were marked by both hardship and transformation. The army, initially weak and underfunded, grew stronger with Western support. Civil society became more mobilized, reinforcing Ukraine’s national identity in the face of Russian aggression.
On February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the largest war in Europe since World War II. Russian President Vladimir Putin justified the assault with false claims that Ukraine was not a legitimate nation and that it needed to be “denazified.”
Initial attacks targeted Kyiv, Kharkiv, and other major cities. Russian forces expected a quick victory, but Ukrainian resistance proved far stronger than anticipated. Under the leadership of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Ukraine rallied both militarily and diplomatically, receiving unprecedented levels of support from Western nations.
The war has been marked by indiscriminate missile strikes, atrocities against civilians, and the displacement of millions. At the same time, Ukraine has achieved significant military successes, pushing Russian forces back from Kyiv and regaining territory in the northeast and south. The conflict remains ongoing, reshaping global politics and reaffirming Ukraine’s role as a frontline defender of democratic values in Europe.
Ukraine’s modern history is a cycle of oppression and resistance. From the famine of the Holodomor to the horrors of World War II, from Soviet domination to the struggle for independence, Ukraine has endured immense suffering but never lost its sense of identity. Today’s war with Russia is the latest chapter in this long struggle, echoing earlier attempts to erase Ukraine’s sovereignty.
Yet the story of Ukraine is not only one of victimhood but also of resilience and determination. The same spirit that carried Ukrainians through the Holodomor, Soviet repression, and past revolutions fuels their fight today. Whatever the outcome of the current conflict, Ukraine has already proven itself to be not a borderland or satellite, but a nation with an unshakable commitment to freedom, democracy, and survival.
Here is where you can write the answer to that question.
Here is where you can write the answer to that question.
Here is where you can write the answer to that question.